Within the Triazole group of fungicides (DMIs – Demethylation Inhibitors), the three most widely used actives today are Difenoconazole, Propiconazole, and Tebuconazole. While they share a common mode of action—inhibiting ergosterol biosynthesis, essential for fungal cell membranes—their systemic properties, disease control spectrum, and real-world effectiveness differ considerably.
So, which one is stronger and more suitable for farmers? Let’s take a detailed look.
1. Comparative Overview Table
Criteria |
Difenoconazole |
Propiconazole |
Tebuconazole |
Fungicide Class |
Triazole |
Triazole |
Triazole |
Systemic Activity |
Very strong |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Preventive Efficacy |
★★★★★ |
★★★★☆ |
★★★★☆ |
Curative Efficacy |
★★★★☆ |
★★★★☆ |
★★★☆☆ |
Disease Control Spectrum |
Broad (anthracnose, blast, downy mildew, rusts...) |
Narrower |
Good for blast, powdery mildew |
Residual Protection |
7–14 days |
5–7 days |
5–7 days |
Rainfastness |
Excellent |
Good |
Good |
Resistance Risk |
Lower |
Moderate |
Higher if overused |
Common Applications |
Fruits, vegetables, rice |
Industrial crops, grains |
Rice, vegetables |
2. Breakdown of Each Active Ingredient
✅ Difenoconazole – A Next-Generation Triazole
Strengths:
Drawback:
👉 Best suited for: Fruits, vegetables, and high-value crops.
✅ Propiconazole – The “Veteran” of Triazoles
Strengths:
Limitations:
👉 Best used in rotation, not for continuous application.
✅ Tebuconazole – Cost-Effective Blast Control
Strengths:
Limitations:
👉 Best for early-stage preventive use – avoid using when disease is advanced.
3. Conclusion: Which Active Ingredient Is Stronger?
In terms of overall efficacy, Difenoconazole stands out due to:
However, Propiconazole and Tebuconazole still have a role when:
👉 Strategic Recommendation:
This approach helps balance cost-efficiency and high disease control effectiveness.
Những bình luận mới nhất